USPTO serial 77551105
ITRAVEL.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ULRICH, NANCY G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITRAVEL.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karuna Ojanen
KARUNA OJANEN OJANEN LAW OFFICES2665 RIVERISDE LANE NEROCHESTER, MN 55906-3456UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Arranging and coordinating travel arrangements for individuals and groups, namely, destinations stays, honeymoons, family vacations, and destination weddings; Arranging travel tours; Organization of travel; Organization of excursions, sightseeing tours, holidays, tours and travel; Organization of travel and boat trips; Providing an on-line computer database in the field of travel information services; Providing information, news and commentary in the field of travel; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation; Travel and tour information service; Travel and tour ticket reservation service; Travel booking agencies; Travel guide and travel information services; Travel information; Travel information services; Travel planning for individuals, families, and groups for special occasions such as destination weddings and honeymoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing advice to tourists and business travelers on hotel and restaurant destinations; Providing personalized information about hotels and temporary accommodations for travel via the Internet; Providing travel lodging information services and travel lodging booking agency services for travelers; Reservation of hotel rooms for travelers; Reservation of rooms for travellers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |