Drawing for ONETOUCH ONLINE PURCHASING

USPTO serial 77551216

ONETOUCH ONLINE PURCHASING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ONETOUCH ONLINE PURCHASING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian J. Winterfeldt, Esq.

Brian J. Winterfeldt, Esq. Steptoe & Johnson LLP1330 Connecticut Aveune, N.W.Washington, DC 20036-1795UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for processing electronic payments and transferring funds to and from others not for use with point of sale terminals for computer software and hardwareACTIVE—
036Clearing and reconciling financial transactions via electronic communications networks, namely, data clearing regarding online purchasesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 26, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 18, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 16, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 16, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 16, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance