USPTO serial 77551238
INB MEHMAN SUPER BASMATI RICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4078442Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 3, 2012
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INB MEHMAN SUPER BASMATI RICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irfan Noman Bernas (Private) Limited
Karachi, PK
Other trademarks owned by Irfan Noman Bernas (Private) Limited
Irfan Noman Bernas (Private) Limited
Karachi, PK
Other trademarks owned by Irfan Noman Bernas (Private) Limited
Irfan Noman Bernas (Private) Limited
Karachi, PK
Other trademarks owned by Irfan Noman Bernas (Private) Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna Mirman Broome
DONNA MIRMAN BROOME GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENUE8TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016-0601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | basmati rice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 23, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Irfan Noman Bernas (Private) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Irfan Noman Bernas (Private) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Irfan Noman Bernas (Private) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named INB MEHMAN SUPER BASMATI RICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |