USPTO serial 77551835
VIBE VENTED INNOVATIVE BASS ENCLOSURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIBE VENTED INNOVATIVE BASS ENCLOSURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sutton, Coldfield, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ken J. Pedersen
KEN J. PEDERSEN PEDERSEN & COMPANY, PLLCPO BOX 2666BOISE, ID 83701-2666UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or image; loudspeakers, loudspeaker and sound systems; sound amplifiers, sound control apparatus; electro-mechanical acoustic converters; parts, fittings and accessories for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | advertising; business management; business administration; the bringing together for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods from a retail audio specialist store, or from an audio specialist catalogue or Internet website specialising In the sale of audio equipment and by mail order or by means of telecommunications; consultancy, advisory and information services to the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | provision of technical information and technical advice relating to loud speakers and audio systems; technical testing services for sound systems and loud speaker systems; research and design services for loud speakers and audio systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Midbass USA Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIBE VENTED INNOVATIVE BASS ENCLOSURES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |