Drawing for CFPID

USPTO serial 77552373

CFPID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CFPID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric J. Goodman

Eric J. Goodman Burkhalter Kessler Goodman & George LLP2020 Main St., Suite 600Irvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer storage device, namely, USB (Universal Serial Bus) hardware for storing authentication information for use in accessing personal or proprietary information, documents, or services via a global computer network; computer software for authenticating information to access personal or proprietary information, documents or services via a global computer network; software with an auto-login feature for securely browsing the global computer network and private networksACTIVE—
035Providing consumer credit monitoring servicesACTIVE—
039Electronic storage of personal or proprietary information and documentsACTIVE—
042Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in accessing personal or proprietary information and documents via a global computer networkACTIVE—
045Electronic monitoring services for security purposes, namely, secure internet browsing in the field of financial transactions; Financial identity monitoring service; consultation in the field of data theft and identity theft; Providing user authentication of electronic funds transfer, credit and debit card and electronic check transactions via a global computer network; Identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information via secure storage and transmitting such information via a global computer network; Security services, namely, conducting recovery operations for the recovery and replacement of personal or proprietary information and documentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 17, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance