USPTO serial 77552385
SMARTFOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTFOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeanette S. Zimmer
Jeanette S. Zimmer FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, INC.7701 LEGACY DRIVEMAIL STOP 3A-421PLANO, TX 75024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Potato based snack foods; fruit and soy based snack foods, excluding breakfast cereals and cereal bars; fruit-based snack foods; nut-based snack foods, namely, nut crisps; nut-based snack foods, namely, nut clusters; candy coated nuts; vegetable-based snack foods; processed edible seeds; snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; snack mixes consisting primarily of dehydrated fruit and processed nuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Corn-based snack foods; grain-based snack foods; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack foods; crackers; snack mixes consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; candy coated popcorn; glazed popcorn; chocolates and chocolate based ready to eat candies and snacks; candy, all of the aforementioned excluding breakfast cereals and cereal bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 2, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |