Drawing for DELIVERING LABORATORIES THAT WORK!

USPTO serial 77552402

DELIVERING LABORATORIES THAT WORK!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELIVERING LABORATORIES THAT WORK!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph V. Myers III

Joseph V. Myers III Seyfarth Shaw LLP1075 Peachtree Street, NESuite 2500Atlanta, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Building inspection services; construction management supervision services; building construction observation, namely, static inspection, functional verification inspection, performance verification inspection; construction supervision services; construction planning services; technical consultation in the field of building construction; consultation services, namely, review of and remedial recommendations for building mechanical, plumbing, electrical systems, computer networks and telecommunications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 12, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 6, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 4, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance