USPTO serial 77553149
MD DERMATICS A SKIN HEALTH SYSTEM DEVELOPED BY DERMATOLOGISTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MD DERMATICS A SKIN HEALTH SYSTEM DEVELOPED BY DERMATOLOGISTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dermatics International Pte Ltd
Tang Logistics #03-02, SG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 EAST 42ND STREETNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; beauty care products, namely, face creams and lotions, personal body creams; hair lotions; soaps; hair care products, namely, hair shampoos, hair conditioners; cosmetic kits comprised of face powders, lipsticks, eyeshadows; cosmetic preparations for use as make-up; non-medicated preparations to remove pigmentation marks; cosmetics for covering up pigmentation marks; non-medicated skin care preparations; nonmedicated skin tonics; non-medicated skin cleansing preparations; non-medicated skin whitening preparations; non-medicated skin emollients; cosmetic preparations for skin tanning; nonmedicated acne creams; astringents for cosmetic purposes; non-medicated preparations, namely, barrier preparations for the skin; brighteners, namely, skin brightening lotions and creams; non-medicated anti-wrinkle preparations; non-medicated anti-aging preparations; non-medicated cleansing pads impregnated with cleansing agents for the skin; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, collagen preparations for cosmetic application; exfoliants for skin; cosmetic slimming products, other than for medical use, namely, skin creams and lotions; non-medicated cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Skin care products medicated, namely, medicated skin care lotions, medicated skin care creams; medicated skin creams; medicated skin lotions; medicated skin care lotions medicated; medicated skin emollients; medicated skin cleansers; medicated skin tonics; medicated skin care treatment for animals, namely, medicated powders and medicated lotions and creams; medicated skin care oils; medicated pharmaceutical preparations for skin care; slimming products for medical use, namely, skin creams and lotions; sun screen preparations for medical purposes; sun skin care products for medical purposes, namely, skin creams and lotions; medicated creams; medicated lotions; supplements and minerals for foodstuffs for human consumption; supplements and vitamins for foodstuffs for human consumption; medicated preparations for nourishing the skin, protecting the skin from ultra-violet light, regeneration of the skin, and the treatment of the skin and the scalp | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |