USPTO serial 77553250
SHOPWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4040083Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2011
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHOPWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VILLE DE LAVAL, QUEBEC, CA
VILLE DE LAVAL, QUEBEC, CA
VILLE DE LAVAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN PETRY
MARVIN PETRY STITES & HARBISON PLLC1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1445UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF, SALE OF, AND BULK AND RETAIL DISTRIBUTION OF CONSTRUCTION ARTICLES AND MATERIAL WORKSHOPS, NAMELY, CABINETS AND FURNITURE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | PROMOTIONAL MARKETING SERVICES FOR SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | TECHNICAL TRAINING IN THE USE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS; TRAINING SERVICES ON THE USE AND EXPLOITATION OF SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN RELATION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION ARTICLES AND MATERIAL WORKSHOPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 20-20 TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 20-20 TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 20-20 TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SHOPWARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 25, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |