Drawing for FLATWAVE

USPTO serial 77553288

FLATWAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLATWAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virginia L. Carron

VIRGINIA L. CARRON FINNEGAN901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical and veterinary apparatus, namely, shock wave therapy apparatus for medical and therapeutic treatment using acoustic shock wavesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 7, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 26, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance