Drawing for SORT+FILE

USPTO serial 77554326

SORT+FILE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SORT+FILE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian R. Coleman

BRIAN R. COLEMAN PERKINS COIE, LLP101 JEFFERSON DRMENLO PARK, CA 94025-1114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in electronic entry and management of timekeeping and expenses for professional services; computer software for use in tracking email activity and facilitating electronic entry and management of timekeeping and expenses for professional services related to email; computer software for facilitating electronic entry and management of timekeeping and expenses for professional services related to telephone calls, voicemail, and audio to text recordingsACTIVE—
042Technical support services, namely, installation, maintenance, and troubleshooting of computer software problems; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for managing timekeeping and expenses for professional services; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for managing telephone calls and messages for professional services; data conversion of voice messages to text messages and associating messages with customer informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance