USPTO serial 77554645
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise Taliaferro
DENISE TALIAFERRO GTECH CORPORATION10 MEMORIAL BLVD STE 100PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-1152UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Computer game software for gaming machines, namely slot machines and video lottery terminals; Gaming machines, namely slot machines and video lottery terminals(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Computer game software for gaming machines, namely slot machines and video lottery terminals; Gaming machines, namely slot machines and video lottery terminals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |