Drawing for NANITE

USPTO serial 77554716

NANITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert V. Gunderson, Jr.

Robert V. Gunderson, Jr. Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hac1200 Seaport Blvd.Redwood City, CA 94063UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for imaging, deploying, and management of computer systems and networks; computer software for application and server integration; computer software for setting up and configuring computer servers; computer software for administration of computer servers and networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Apr 8, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 31, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 31, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Oct 12, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 6, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 6, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 25, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 25, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 15, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 15, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 13, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Aug 13, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 17, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance