Drawing for ARROWPOINT ADVISORS

USPTO serial 77554724

ARROWPOINT ADVISORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARROWPOINT ADVISORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jayne Conway Hunter

Jayne Conway Hunter HUNTER LAW FIRM, PLLC300 East Kingston AvenueSuite 200CHARLOTTE, NC 28203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035consulting services in the field of business auditing and insurance claims auditingACTIVE—
036INSURANCE SERVICES, NAMELY, writing property casualty insurance; underwriting in the fields of property and casualty insurance; insurance claims processing; insurance claims servicing, namely, claims administration and premium rate COMPUTING; actuarial services; insurance consulting services; administration of and consulting in the field of employee retirement plansACTIVE—
045litigation support services, namely, consulting on and managing insurance-related ligitationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 25, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 24, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 22, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 22, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 3, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance