USPTO serial 77554816
EDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Hartnell
GEORGE W. HARTNELL WEINGARTEN, SCHURGIN, GAGNEBIN & LEBOVICI LLP10 POST OFFICE SQ STE 500SBOSTON, MA 02109-4607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Power control product, namely, grid-connected electronics in the nature of converters, inverters, microconverters, microinverters, and software for controlling the converters, inverters, microconverters, microinverters for use in connection with renewable and alternative energy sources, namely, solar energy, wind energy, hydraulic flow energy, and fuel cells; power conditioning products, namely, grid-connected electronics in the nature of converters, inverters, microconverters, microinverters, and software for controlling the converters, inverters, microconverters, microinverters for use in connection with renewable and alternative energy sources, namely, solar energy, wind energy, hydraulic flow energy and fuel cells; and power conversion products, namely, grid-connected electronics in the nature of converters, inverters, microconverters, microinverters, and control systems comprising a device for controlling the switching function of the converters, inverters, microconverters, and microinverters for use in connection with renewable and alternative energy sources, namely, solar energy, wind energy, hydraulic flow energy and fuel cells | ACTIVE | Aug 25, 2008 |
| 042 | Engineering services, namely, for development and design of power control products, namely, grid-connected electronics in the nature of converters, inverters, microconverters, microinverters, and software therefor for use in connection with renewable and alternative energy sources, namely, solar energy, wind energy, hydraulic flow energy, and fuel cells; for development and design of power conditioning products, namely, converters, inverters, microconverters, microinverters, and software therefor for use in connection with renewable and alternative energy sources, namely, solar energy, wind energy, hydraulic flow energy, and fuel cells; and development and design of converters, inverters, microconverters, microinverters, and control systems for converters, inverters, microconverters and microinverters for power control, power conditioning, power management, and power conversion industries for use in connection with renewable and alternative energy sources, namely, solar energy, wind energy, hydraulic flow energy, and fuel cells | ACTIVE | Aug 25, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SatCon Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SatCon Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EDGE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |