USPTO serial 77555026
COMPLEXIONS RX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3795177Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2010
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPLEXIONS RX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori M. Lofstrom
GEORGE R MCGUIRE BOND SCHOENECK & KING PLLCONE LINCOLN CENTERSYRACUSE, NY 13202-1355UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin and body care cosmetic products, namely, non-medicated skin cleansers, masks, lotions, creams and gels, non-medicated foot and body scrubs, hair shampoos and conditioners and other hair styling aids, namely, mousse, foam and gel for hair | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2009 |
| 005 | Medicated skin and body care products, namely, acne treatment preparations containing benzyl peroxide, medicated topical skin creams and gels, antimicrobial skin cleansers and medicated shampoos and conditioners | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Complexions Day Spa & Wellness Center, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Complexions Day Spa & Wellness Center, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named COMPLEXIONS RX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2014 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |