USPTO serial 77555467
LOOPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOOPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo 107-0062, JP
Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James P. Broder
JAMES P. BRODER ROEDER & BRODER LLP9915 MIRA MESA BLVD STE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92131-7002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Ankle socks; Baby tops; Bathing suits; Boxer briefs; Boxer shorts; Bras; Button-front aloha shirts; Camisoles; Coats for men and women; Dress shirts; Golf shirts; Gym shorts; Hooded sweat shirts; Long-sleeved shirts; Men's and women's jackets, coats, trousers, vests; Men's socks; Mufflers; Open-necked shirts; Pajamas; Panties, shorts and briefs; Pants; Scarves; Shawls and headscarves; Shirts; Short trousers; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Short-sleeved shirts; Shorts; Shoulder scarves; Sleeved or sleeveless jackets; Socks and stockings; Stoles; Sweat jackets; Sweat shirts; Sweaters; Swim trunks; Swim wear; Swimsuits; T-shirts; Tank tops; Tops; Undergarments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |