Drawing for TVLICIOUS

USPTO serial 77556516

TVLICIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TVLICIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ted M. Anthony

Ted M. Anthony Babineaux, Poche', Anthony & Slavich, LLP. O. Box 52169Lafayette, LA 70505UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing on-line streaming of audio and video material for terrestrial and Internet radio via mobile devices; electronic transmission of advertising and marketing data and information via the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 19, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 3, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance