Drawing for DOLCE VANITA

USPTO serial 77558757

DOLCE VANITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOLCE VANITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley P. Heisler

BRADLEY P. HEISLER HEISLER & ASSOCIATES3017 DOUGLAS BLVD STE 300ROSEVILLE, CA 95661-3850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services, Internet and mail order services featuring perfumes, perfumery products, namely, colognes, toilet waters, essential oils for personal use, namely, bath oils, body oils and massage oils, soaps and cosmetics, namely, bath gels, bath powders, non-medicated bath salts, beauty masks, body creams, body powders, cosmetic pencils, hand creams, night creams, skin cleansing creams, skin creams, vanishing creams, eye creams, skin lotions, facial lotions, body lotions, skin moisturizers, shower gels, skin clarifiers, skin soaps, sun tanning preparations and toilet soaps, make-up products, namely, eye makeup, eye makeup remover, eye pencils, eye shadow, eyebrow pencils, eyeliner, face powder, lipstick, makeup mascara, nail polish, nail polish remover and rouge, hair lotions, hair shampoos, cosmetic face powders for the skin and mineral makeupACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 27, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2008CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance