Drawing for MARCY NANOCENTER

USPTO serial 77562121

MARCY NANOCENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARCY NANOCENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel T. Earle

Daniel T. Earle SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP5845 RICHMOND HIGHWAY, SUITE 415ALEXANDRIA, VA 22303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035(Based on Use) Economic development services, namely, economic business outreach to attract high-tech industry businesses and assisting businesses to access and obtain private and government funding; business incubator services and fostering collaboration, namely, hosting business meetings and facilitating business consortia between industry, academia and government in the fields of nanotechnology, nanosciences and/or advanced materials; (Based on Intent to Use) providing a product demonstration site for businesses in the fields of nanotechnology, nanosciences and/or advanced materials; business facility management services for others in the fields of nanotechnology, nanosciences and/or advanced materialsABANDONEDMar 21, 2007
041(Based on Intent to Use) Educational services, namely, providing classes and seminars in the fields of nanotechnology, nanosciences and/or advanced materialsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 11, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance