USPTO serial 77563377
INVESTFLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INVESTFLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farley I. Weiss and Mark H. Weiss
FARLEY I. WEISS AND MARK H. WEISS WEISS & MOY, P.C.4204 N BROWN AVESCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251-3914UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |