USPTO serial 77563428
Serial No. 77563428
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 77563428?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Lowe
David A. Lowe Lowe Graham Jones701 Fifth AvenueSuite 4800Seattle, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software programs for accessing, extracting, monitoring, managing, analyzing and reporting computerized data used in the fields of auditing, accounting, data management, data analysis, financial management, internal controls management, governance, risk management, compliance, fraud detection, business assurance and business intelligence; Electronic publications, namely, newsletters, books, instruction manuals, guide and workbooks that are downloadable and/or recorded on computer media, in the fields of auditing, accounting, data management, data analysis, financial management, internal financial controls management, governance, risk management, compliance, fraud detection, business assurance and business intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, newsletters, books, instruction manuals, guide and workbooks, in the fields of auditing, accounting, data management, data analysis, financial management, internal controls management, governance, risk management, compliance, fraud detection, business assurance and business intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational training services, including those provided online, relating to the use and operation of computer software programs for use in the fields of auditing, accounting, data management, data analysis, financial management, internal controls management, governance, risk management, compliance, fraud detection, business assurance and business intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services, technical support services, computer programming services, and providing online updating of computer software for others via the Internet, all relating to computer software programs, in the fields of auditing, accounting, data management, data analysis, financial management, internal controls management, governance, risk management, compliance, fraud detection, business assurance and business intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |