Drawing for NET WORTH COFFEE BROKERS

USPTO serial 77563453

NET WORTH COFFEE BROKERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NET WORTH COFFEE BROKERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011electric coffee makers, electric tea pots, electric tea kettlesACTIVE
021mugs, coffee cups, tea cups, beverageware, non-electric coffee makers, non-electric tea pots, tea kettles, coffee serving accessories, namely, coffee stirrers, tea serving accessories, namely, tea stirrersACTIVE
025clothing, namely, shirts and t-shirts, aprons, shorts, jackets; headwear, hats and capsACTIVE
030coffee, coffee beans, ground coffee beans, roasted coffee beans; tea; tea sold in pouches, tea based beverages; tea based beverages with potpourriACTIVE
035online retail store services for coffee beans, ground coffee beans, roasted coffee beans; tea, tea based beverages, tea based products, tea products, clothing, headwear, beverageware, mugs, cupsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 22, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 22, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 16, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 15, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance