USPTO serial 77563501
CHILD ADVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHILD ADVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brooke Erdos Singer, Esq.
BROOKE ERDOS SINGER, ESQ. DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAY FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10019-4379UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dental impression materials for making dental molds; DNA swab, namely, cotton swabs for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for maintaining and storing contact information, description and pictures of children | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Fingerprint kits comprised of an ink strip and paper; paper document folder for identification purposes that holds pictures, stickers, and identification cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes offering personal safety quizzes for children in the field of child safety | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Credit report monitoring services geared towards children to facilitate the detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud; internet monitoring of email addresses to determine registration with social network sites to facilitate the detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud; fraud alert, namely, monitoring the Internet and public records to facilitate the detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud; identify theft prevention and theft repair services for the benefit of children, namely, personal information identity monitoring and fraud resolution assistance in the nature of consultation and advice in the field of identify theft; background checks, namely, background investigations; privacy protection, namely, consultation in the field of identity theft; safety tips for children, namely, providing information in the field of child safety | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trilegiant Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Trilegiant Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CHILD ADVANTAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 29, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |