Drawing for CLS

USPTO serial 77563581

CLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

F. Michael Sajovec

F. Michael Sajovec Myers Bigel Sibley & Sajovec, P.A.4140 Parklake Avenue, Suite 600Raleigh, NC 27612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Supply chain logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of goods for others by air, rail, ship or truckACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 24, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 19, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 26, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 22, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 21, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 21, 2009ISSRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST
Mar 31, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 26, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2009CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Jan 16, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 15, 2009GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2009GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2009CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Dec 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 10, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Sep 9, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance