Drawing for JR

USPTO serial 77564244

JR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Bryan

ROBERT H. CAMERON ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON101 N TRYON ST STE 1900CHARLOTTE, NC 28246-0106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, participation in professional automobile races and related exhibitionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 20, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 21, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 21, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Sep 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance