USPTO serial 77566330
ARCUS CAPITAL PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARCUS CAPITAL PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Hobbs, Jr.
MICHAEL D HOBBS JR TROUTMAN SANDERS LLPBANK OF AMERICA PLAZA600 PEACHTREE STREET NE SUITE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial planning and consulting, namely, wealth and capital management services | ACTIVE | Sep 3, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |