USPTO serial 77566412
FIDELITY MOBILE BANKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIDELITY MOBILE BANKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Baton Rouge, LA
Baton Rouge, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Chastain, Jr.
JAMES R. CHASTAIN, JR. KEAN MILLER HAWTHORNE D'ARMOND, ET AL.PO BOX 3513BATON ROUGE, LA 70821-3513UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | banking services provided by mobile telephone connections | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |