USPTO serial 77566969
SASHA FIERCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SASHA FIERCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARRY W. MCFARLAND
LARRY W. MCFARLAND KEATS, MCFARLAND & WILSON LLP9720 WILSHIRE BLVD PHBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-2017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | FRAGRANCE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |