Drawing for SOUTH PHILLY CHEESE STEAKS THE CHEESESTEAK CHAMP

USPTO serial 77568124

SOUTH PHILLY CHEESE STEAKS THE CHEESESTEAK CHAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SOUTH PHILLY CHEESE STEAKS THE CHEESESTEAK CHAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil L. Arney

NEIL L ARNEY KUTAK ROCK LLP1801 CALIFORNIA STSuite 3000DENVER, CO 80202-2626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant ServicesABANDONEDJan 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jul 25, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jul 25, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jul 25, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Sep 25, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
May 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 30, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 11, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Sep 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance