USPTO serial 77568233
BI-LINGUAL THERAPIES INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3741306Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 19, 2010
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BI-LINGUAL THERAPIES INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Albuquerque, NM
Albuquerque, NM
Albuquerque, NM
Albuquerque, NM
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Occupational therapy services; Physical therapy; Speech and hearing therapy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 7, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Montoya-Soto, Dessie
- Other trademarks owned by Montoya-Soto, Dessie
- Other trademarks owned by Soto, Oscar
- Other trademarks owned by Soto, Oscar
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BI-LINGUAL THERAPIES INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |