USPTO serial 77568561
PIZZA INN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 20, 2010
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PIZZA INN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Colony, TX
The Colony, TX
The Colony, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca Liebowitz
Rebecca Liebowitz VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | PIZZA; PIZZA CRUST, NAMELY, PIZZA CRUST TOPPED WITH FRUIT FOR CONSUMPTION; SALAD DRESSING | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | RESTAURANT SERVICES; CARRY-OUT RESTAURANT SERVICES; RESTAURANTS FEATURING HOME DELIVERY [; PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA THE INTERNET IN THE FIELD OF DINING, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION ON RESTAURANTS AND RESTAURANT LOCATIONS] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2023 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 26, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 12, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2021 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2021 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 31, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 31, 2021 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |