Drawing for MAXSIP

USPTO serial 77568876

MAXSIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAXSIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ben Natter

Ben Natter NATTER & NATTER501 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Web page hosting services, web page design services for others, design in the field of telecommunications and computerized communications, namely, design of unified communications systems; technical consulting in computer programming and in the field of real-time reconfigurable wireless communication handsets and network equipment for use in wideband communications; computer and network design services for others in the field of information technology; providing data center services, namely, the centralized software installation and maintenance for others for use as storage used by an Application Service Provider to maintain database information of others; monitoring of the telecommunications computer systems of others for technical purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server on a global computer network, hosting of digital content on the Internet, maintenance of websites for others; application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; providing temporary use of non-downloadable network auditing software in the fields of secure communications and data networks; design for others in the field of computerized communications and data networksABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 21, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 21, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jun 21, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Feb 18, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Feb 18, 2010OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 11, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 15, 2009CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED
May 15, 2009CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
May 14, 2009CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Nov 17, 2008CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED
Nov 17, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Nov 14, 2008CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Nov 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 10, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Sep 17, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance