Drawing for HERMITAGE

USPTO serial 77569655

HERMITAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HERMITAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Antony J. McShane

ANTONY J. MCSHANE NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG LLP2 N LASALLE ST STE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60602-3882UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Pre-printed paper, namely, bulletins concerning church services, religious services, weddings, funerals, graduations, and other civic, community, and social events, stationery, letterhead, envelopes, envelope inserts, bookmarks, certificates, diplomas, cards, namely, prayer, holy, and greeting, calendars, programs in the nature of school, church and other civic, community, and social events programs, program covers, and foldersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 18, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 28, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 28, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 28, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 28, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 28, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 13, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance