USPTO serial 77569663
SHEILA FAJL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHEILA FAJL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Agoura Hills, CA
Agoura Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc J. Kesten
MARC J. KESTEN MARC J. KESTEN, P.L.9220 NW 72ND STPARKLAND, FL 33067-2619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All purpose sport bags; All-purpose athletic bags; All-purpose carrying bags; Animal carriers; Baby carriers worn on the body; Baby carrying bags; Backpacks; Backpacks; Beach bags; Beach umbrellas; Billfolds; Book bags; Briefcases; Briefcases; Briefcases and attache cases; Business card cases; Card wallets; Carry-all bags; Carry-on bags; Change purses; Clutch bags; Clutch purses; Clutches; Coin purses; Cosmetic bags sold empty; Cosmetic carrying cases sold empty; Cosmetic cases sold empty; Credit card cases; Diaper bags; Document cases; Duffle bags; Evening handbags; Fanny packs; Flexible bags for garments; Garment bags for travel; Gym bags; Handbags; Infant carriers worn on the body; Key case; Key wallets; Knapsacks; Leather and imitation leather bags; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Leather cases; Leather pouches; Luggage; Make-up bags sold empty; Name card cases; Overnight bags; Overnight cases; Overnight suitcases; Pocketbooks; Purses; Rucksacks; Satchels; Shoulder bags; Sport bags; Suitcases; Toiletry bags sold empty; Tote bags; Travel bags; Travel cases; Trunks; Umbrellas; Wallets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |