USPTO serial 77569973
EAZITOOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EAZITOOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly B. Markley
MOLLY B. MARKLEY YOUNG BASILE3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND TOOLS AND HAND-OPERATED IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY FORKS, SPADES, RAKES, HOES, SHOVELS, AND SWEEPING BRUSHES; HAND TOOLS AND IMPLEMENTS FOR USE IN GARDENS AND HORTICULTURAL ESTABLISHMENTS, NAMELY GARDEN FORKS, GARDEN SPADES, EDGING FORKS, EDGING SPADES, WEEDING FORKS, WEEDING SPADES, GARDEN RAKES, GARDEN HOES, AND SWEEPING BRUSHES; HAND TOOLS AND HAND-OPERATED IMPLEMENTS FOR USE IN STABLES, NAMELY MANURE FORKS, SHAVINGS FORKS, ARENA RAKES, STABLE AND YARD SWEEPING BRUSHES; HAND TOOLS AND HAND-OPERATED IMPLEMENTS FOR USE IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY, NAMELY, SPADES, SHOVELS, AND SWEEPING BRUSHES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |