CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for STICKNSTAY

USPTO serial 77570129

STICKNSTAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STICKNSTAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lucy B. Arant

Lucy B. Arant Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, LLP11377 West Olympic BoulevardLos Angeles, CA 90064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016StickersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 11, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 28, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 28, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 14, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 31, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 31, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance