USPTO serial 77570385
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Michal
Robert P. Michal Carter DeLuca & Farrell LLP576 Broad Hollow RoadMelville, NY 11747UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Modulation transfer function (MTF) testers, namely, sensors, for measuring the image quality of mobile phone lenses; modulation transfer function (MTF) testers, namely, sensors for measuring the image quality and image resolution of camera modules which are each comprised of imaging optics, a charge coupled device (CCD) sensor or a complimentary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) sensor; wavefront testers, namely, optical wavefront sensors for measuring the wavefront of optical lenses; modulation transfer function (MTF) testers, namely, sensors, for measuring the image quality of optical lenses; aspheric lens testers, namely, optical measurement sensors that measure the surface topography of an aspherical lens; topography sensors, namely, optical measurement sensors that measure the topography of surfaces; chromatic sensors, namely, sensors which measure distance with submicron accuracy | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Measurement of modulation transfer function (MTF) in mobile phone lenses and cameras for others; measurement of wavefront, namely, testing of optical lenses for others; measurement of modulation transfer function (MTF) of mobile phone lenses and camera modules which are each comprised of imaging optics, namely, an image-forming optical system and a charge coupled device (CCD) sensor or a complimentary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) sensor, for others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 25, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 25, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |