Drawing for RANDOLPH-MACON WOMAN'S COLLEGE AND RANDOLPH COLLEGE ALUMNAE/ALUMNI ASSOCIATION

USPTO serial 77570752

RANDOLPH-MACON WOMAN'S COLLEGE AND RANDOLPH COLLEGE ALUMNAE/ALUMNI ASSOCIATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RANDOLPH-MACON WOMAN'S COLLEGE AND RANDOLPH COLLEGE ALUMNAE/ALUMNI ASSOCIATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas B. Smith

DOUGLAS B. SMITH MCGUIREWOODS LLP901 EAST CARY STREETONE JAMES CENTERRICHMOND, VA 23219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
200Indicating membership in an association of alumnae of Randolph-Macon Woman's College and alumnae and alumni of Randolph CollegeACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 5, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 5, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 5, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 7, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 7, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2008CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 22, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Dec 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance