Drawing for JOKER'S WILD

USPTO serial 77571649

JOKER'S WILD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JOKER'S WILD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick D. Archibald

PATRICK D. ARCHIBALD ARCHIBALD IP LLC25 MALL RD STE 300BURLINGTON, MA 01803-4145UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2011UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED
Mar 7, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 24, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 23, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 23, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 5, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Nov 5, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 5, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 2, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 10, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 21, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance