CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for INNOVATIVE FLAVORS

USPTO serial 77572249

INNOVATIVE FLAVORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INNOVATIVE FLAVORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary E. Hood

GARY E. HOOD MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF300 S WACKER DR STE 3100CHICAGO, IL 60606-6706UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Food and food items for consumption, namely, soup mixes, soups and preparations for making soups, soup pastes, soup bases, food bases, meat pastes, vegetable pastes, seafood pastes, bouillon concentratesACTIVE—
030Food items for the improvement of the flavor of food, namely, gravy and gravy mixes, sauce and sauce mixes, flavorings, seasonings, flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products, seasoning mixes for soups, concentrates used for seasoning, seasoning pastesACTIVE—
040Custom formulation of flavorings and seasonings used in the food industry, contract manufacturing of flavorings and seasonings used in the food industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 15, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance