CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for IISIS

USPTO serial 77572909

IISIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IISIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexis Dillett Isztwan

Alexis Dillett Isztwan Semanoff Ormsby Greenberg & Torchia, LLC2617 Huntingdon PikeHuntingdon Valley, PA 19006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESSING PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOTECHNOLOGY-RELATED DATAACTIVE—
042PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS AND PROPOSALS, AND THE TRACKING THEREOF; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR SEARCHING USER SPECIFIED DATA FOR INVESTIGATOR INITIATED STUDIES IN THE FIELDS OF PHARMACOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 23, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 5, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 5, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance