Drawing for GARANIMALS

USPTO serial 77573497

GARANIMALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GARANIMALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Epstein

ROBERT L. EPSTEIN EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 E. 42nd Street, Suite 2410NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016A series of children's booksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 11, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 7, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 7, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance