Drawing for ATG LIVESTORE

USPTO serial 77574095

ATG LIVESTORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATG LIVESTORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Heisler Lavalley

Jennifer Heisler Lavalley GTC Law Group LLP & Affiliates400 Blue Hill Drive, Suite 2Westwood, MA 02090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and downloadable computer software for e-commerce and on-line transactions, namely, e-commerce reference applications software for use in building, developing, operating, and managing interactive websites and performing e-commerce transactions via interactive websites on a global computer or communications networkACTIVE—
042Computer software consulting and development services related to e-commerce, namely, designing, developing, and implementing e-commerce reference applications software for use in building, developing, operating, and managing interactive websites and performing e-commerce transactions via interactive websites on a global computer or communications network; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting e-commerce computer reference software applications for use by others for building and developing websites and performing e-commerce transactions through websites; Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software for use by others for building and developing websites and performing e-commerce transactions through websites; Creating, developing, building, operating, and hosting interactive e-commerce websites for others; Computer software technical support services, namely, providing end-users with assistance and information related to implementation and use of e-commerce reference applications software for building and developing interactive websites and performing e-commerce transactions, and troubleshooting problems relate theretoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 3, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 3, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance