USPTO serial 77574845
LUMETA SOLAR INNOVATION FROM CALIFORNIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUMETA SOLAR INNOVATION FROM CALIFORNIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Lambertsen
John C. Lambertsen Kenehan & Lambertsen, Ltd.6900 West Cliff Drive, Suite 104Las Vegas, NV 89145-0195UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metal roofing tiles having integrated solar panels | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |