USPTO serial 77575867
MARSHLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARSHLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Blynn Shideler
BLYNN SHIDELER THE BLK LAW GROUP3500 BROOKTREE RD STE 200WEXFORD, PA 15090-9277UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Fabric sold as an integral component of finished clothing items, namely, camouflage jackets, camouflage vests, camouflage pants, camouflage overalls, camouflage overall bibs, camouflage hats, camouflage gloves, camouflage socks, and camouflage shirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |