Drawing for IDENTITY SCIENCES

USPTO serial 77575948

IDENTITY SCIENCES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDENTITY SCIENCES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William D. Lee, Jr.

WILLIAM D LEE JR MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A.P.O. BOX 447GREENVILLE, SC 29602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Test sample collection products, namely, glass chips for receiving human protein, array-spotted substrates for receiving human individual specific auto antibodies by application of blood, semen, saliva, perspiration, or tears for antibody profile detectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 19, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 18, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 7, 2010RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Apr 20, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 10, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 11, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance