USPTO serial 77576419
NO WALLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO WALLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeff Rothenberg
JEFF ROTHENBERG HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRALBANY, NY 12203-5180UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely internet operating system software for creating a personal computing environment in an internet browser, internet desktop software for accessing a personal desktop through an internet browser, software for accessing one web site through another web site, software for authentication of a user from one Web service to another, software for transferring data from one web service to another, and software for browsing data on a web site, and software for placing advertisements in internet based software applications | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2007 |
| 042 | Hosting and maintenance of Internet sites for third parties, namely, hosting an internet operating system for providing a personal computing environment accessible via an internet browser, hosting an internet desktop which is accessible through an internet browser, hosting a computer file system accessible through the internet, hosting a data graph website accessible on the internet; application service provider services namely, hosting software for browsing a data graph on the internet, hosting software tools for computer assisted software development for developing software through an internet browser, hosting single sign-in authentication software for browsing from one Web application to another with a single sign-in event | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PDMS | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |