Drawing for PARADOX MEDIA

USPTO serial 77576630

PARADOX MEDIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
THOMAS, JANICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARADOX MEDIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gabrielle S. Roth

GABRIELLE S. ROTH DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 EYE ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-5403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Production of motion picture films, movies and television programs for distribution through theatres, television, video, cable and satellite systems, telephones and consumer electronic devicesACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Jan 4, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Dec 7, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Dec 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Jun 10, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Jun 7, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Jun 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Jan 5, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Dec 20, 2010IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTEREDโ€”
Dec 20, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVEDโ€”
Dec 14, 2010INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUESTโ€”
Dec 6, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Dec 6, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Jun 29, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Jun 29, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Jun 3, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Jun 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 11, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Nov 11, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Feb 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Feb 9, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Jan 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Jan 28, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
Jan 28, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
Jan 28, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
Jan 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Jan 5, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Sep 26, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance