USPTO serial 77577334
EASYCLICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASYCLICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AIMEE L. KAPLAN & STEWART J. BELLUS
AIMEE L. KAPLAN & STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mechanically operated tools, namely, mechanical hand crimpers, hydraulic hand crimpers, strippers for multifiber buffers; hand-held power-operated tools, other than hand-operated, namely, crimpers; machine parts, namely, blades; machines, namely, moulding machines, stitching machines, mechanical crimping machine, toggle press, pneumatic crimping machine; machine tools, namely, notchers, crimping dies and locators for crimping machines, punching machines, riveting machines electric, hydraulic or pneumatic actuated cutters; chucks for power drills; plug-in-tools, namely, power hammer chisels and SDS+ and SDSmax chisels for electric hammers, air hammer chisels for pneumatic and electric hammers | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand-operated hand tools, namely, Swedish pattern pipe wrenches, sanitary wrenches, pipe/tube cutters, notching pliers, grip pliers, locking pliers, cable duct cutters, Pelican cutters, revolving punch pliers, circlip pliers, scrapers, crowbars, crimping tools, namely, 4-indent crimpers; crimping pliers, assembling tools, namely, insertion and removal tools for turned contacts; cable cutter tools, namely, cable shears, ratchet cable cutters, multifunction tool for data cables, cutters for man-made fibers for use in the industrial arts; stripping tools, namely, automatic self-adjusting insulation strippers, automatic insulation strippers, microstrippers for polymer coatings, sheets, and films; dismantling knives, insulation strippers; bits for hand drills, punch pliers, blades for strippers and cutters, tube cutters, scissors, spanners; pliers; crow bars; penknives; tweezers; graving tools, namely, hand-held flat, cross-cut, pointed, mason's electrician's, slitting, jointing, floor, grooving and parting chisels, centre punches; striking tools, namely, hand-held flat, cross-cut, pointed, mason's, electrician's, slitting, joint flooring, grooving and partial chisels, rivet setters, rivet headers, assembly plugs, assembly taper punches, impact nail setters; hand-operated tools, namely, cutters for optical fibres, strippers for optical fibers, strippers and crimpers for plugs, for stripping, cuffing and connecting of optical fibers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |