Drawing for EASYCLICK

USPTO serial 77577334

EASYCLICK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EASYCLICK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AIMEE L. KAPLAN & STEWART J. BELLUS

AIMEE L. KAPLAN & STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mechanically operated tools, namely, mechanical hand crimpers, hydraulic hand crimpers, strippers for multifiber buffers; hand-held power-operated tools, other than hand-operated, namely, crimpers; machine parts, namely, blades; machines, namely, moulding machines, stitching machines, mechanical crimping machine, toggle press, pneumatic crimping machine; machine tools, namely, notchers, crimping dies and locators for crimping machines, punching machines, riveting machines electric, hydraulic or pneumatic actuated cutters; chucks for power drills; plug-in-tools, namely, power hammer chisels and SDS+ and SDSmax chisels for electric hammers, air hammer chisels for pneumatic and electric hammersACTIVE—
008Hand-operated hand tools, namely, Swedish pattern pipe wrenches, sanitary wrenches, pipe/tube cutters, notching pliers, grip pliers, locking pliers, cable duct cutters, Pelican cutters, revolving punch pliers, circlip pliers, scrapers, crowbars, crimping tools, namely, 4-indent crimpers; crimping pliers, assembling tools, namely, insertion and removal tools for turned contacts; cable cutter tools, namely, cable shears, ratchet cable cutters, multifunction tool for data cables, cutters for man-made fibers for use in the industrial arts; stripping tools, namely, automatic self-adjusting insulation strippers, automatic insulation strippers, microstrippers for polymer coatings, sheets, and films; dismantling knives, insulation strippers; bits for hand drills, punch pliers, blades for strippers and cutters, tube cutters, scissors, spanners; pliers; crow bars; penknives; tweezers; graving tools, namely, hand-held flat, cross-cut, pointed, mason's electrician's, slitting, jointing, floor, grooving and parting chisels, centre punches; striking tools, namely, hand-held flat, cross-cut, pointed, mason's, electrician's, slitting, joint flooring, grooving and partial chisels, rivet setters, rivet headers, assembly plugs, assembly taper punches, impact nail setters; hand-operated tools, namely, cutters for optical fibres, strippers for optical fibers, strippers and crimpers for plugs, for stripping, cuffing and connecting of optical fibersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 7, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 29, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance